Part of the Swine Flu Vaccine has a component of the AIDS virus.
The Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu
By Dr Russell Blaylock
http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/dr-russell-blaylock-
vaccine-may-be-more-dangerous-than-swine-flu/
"...Novartis, the second contender, also has an agreement with WHO for a pandemic vaccine. Novartis appears to have won the contract, since their vaccine is near completion. What is terrifying is that these pandemic vaccines contain ingredients, called immune adjuvants that a number of studies have shown cause devastating autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus.
Animal studies using this adjuvant have found them to be deadly. A study using 14 guinea pigs found that when they were injected with the special adjuvant, only one animal survived. A repeat of the study found the same deadly outcome.
So, what is this deadly ingredient? It is called squalene, a type of oil. The Chiron company, maker of the deadly anthrax vaccine, makes an adjuvant called MF-59 which contains two main ingredients of concern-squalene and gp120. A number of studies have shown that squalene can trigger all of the above-mentioned autoimmune diseases when injected.
The MF-59 adjuvant has been used in several vaccines. These vaccines, including tetanus and diphtheria, are the same vaccines frequently associated with adverse reactions.
I reviewed a number of studies on this adjuvant and found something quite interesting. Several studies done on human test subjects found MF-59 to be a very safe immune adjuvant. But when I checked to see who did these studies, I found-to no surprise-that they were done by the Novartis Pharmaceutical Company and Chiron Pharmaceutical Company, which have merged. They were all published in "prestigious" medical journals. Also, to no surprise, a great number of studies done by independent laboratories and research institutions all found a strong link between MF-59 and autoimmune diseases.
Squalene in vaccines has been strongly linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. On August 1991, Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted that soldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had an increased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig's disease. The soldiers also suffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such as polyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (a neurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord), endocarditis (inflammation of the heart's inner lining), optic neuritis with blindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).
The second ingredient, and one that greatly concerns me, is called gp120, a glycoprotein. Researchers found when it was mixed with squalene, the glycoprotein became strongly antigenic - that is, it produced a powerful and prolonged immune response to the vaccination. In fact, their studies show that with each dose, the intense immune reaction lasts over a year.
Now for the shocker-the glycoprotein-gp120, a major component of MF-59 vaccine adjuvant, is the same protein fragment isolated from HIV - the virus that is responsible for the rapid dementia seen in AIDS patients.
Studies have shown that when gp120 is taken up by the microglia cells in the brain, it causes intense inflammation and makes the brain subject to excitotoxic damage-a process called immunoexcitotoxicity. This is also the cause of the MS and optic neuritis associated with vaccines that contain MF-59.
So, how would the gp120 get into the brain? Studies of other immune adjuvants using careful tracer techniques have shown that they routinely enter the brain following vaccination. What most people do not know, even the doctors who recommend the vaccines, is that most such studies by pharmaceutical companies observe the patients for only one to two weeks following vaccination-these types of reactions may take months or even years to manifest.
It is obvious that the vaccine manufacturers stand to make billions of dollars in profits from this WHO/government-promoted pandemic. Novartis, the maker of the new pandemic vaccine, recently announced that they would not give free vaccines to impoverished nations-everybody pays.
One must keep in mind that once the vaccine is injected, there is little you can do to protect yourself-at least by conventional medicine. It will mean a lifetime of crippling illness and early death.
There are much safer ways to protect oneself from this flu virus, such as higher doses of vitamin D3, selective immune enhancement using supplements, and a good diet." End of excerpt by Dr. Blaylock.
16 comments:
Not much in the way of reputable sources there, Henry.
I'll have to point any readers in the direction of the WHO and SBM
Who are all presumably part of the conspiracy.
I'm still waiting for my cheque from Glaxo. Never trust that big farmer.
Salted In view of them publically stating that Mercola is wrong Do you realise there is an injunction about Sucralose?
You cant see his page about it
It was developed as an insecticide.
What does that tell you?
Its being sold in the supermarkets as Splenda.
Honestly I can't help you Salted. Theres only so much that I can do.
As the old saying goes you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink.
But I do know that GP120 is part of the Aids Virus Anyone can look that up in a textbook
Then I'm afraid this horse must go thirsty Henry.
Developed as an insecticide?
That is interesting.
It tastes vile as well.
Thing is, Henry, you keep digging up these sites that are filled with aspersions and scary language, but no real substance.
And when the information is written by doctors they are always on the 'fringe', talking about the great conspiracy being waged on the British or American people; a conspiracy so vast (governments, public health departments, private health departments, Big Pharma, the media) that the scale of it must be staggering.
And this is all happening when we see governments cocking up even the most simple tasks; big pharmaceutical companies who normally undermine each other at every turn, who incidentally would make FAR MORE money out of treating illnesses then preventing them with vaccines (which they hate making because the profits are trivial);
All of the vast number of clinical studies, painstakingly researched and ruthlessly peer-reviewed by people who want to prove them wrong, even their friends, BECAUSE THAT'S SCIENCE.
You believe that somehow all of these people and institutions who are normally so utterly at odds with each other, suddenly come together to con the entire world (even though they have kids and relatives of their own which it would surely effect), working like cogs in a well-oiled machine...for what?
What is the motive here, Henry?
If Vitamin D was a panacea for everything, do you not think the $80 billion supplement industry would've cottoned on by now?
If vaccines were poisonous, filled with AIDS and cancer and whatever the hell you'll find tomorrow, do you not think that the manufacturer's competitor would brutally capitalise on that, even if they had no competing vaccine of their own? Does it strike you as a nice industry?
Did it not occur to you, just once, that these fringe ideas might be fringe for a reason? Being, as a they are, at total odds with the vast body of evidence in line with the 'mainstream' (that clinical evidence being the only means we have of proving anything)?
Not that I'm saying that modern medicine is perfect, or that vaccines don't have side-effects, or that Big Pharma isn't utterly reprehensible 6 days out of 7; but we cant believe everything every kook with an 'alternative' view babbles out, magnifying the relevance of their statements as though being at odds with the 'mainstream' were some kind of qualification.
I've gone on a bit now, Henry, and rather pompously I'm going to end on a quote:
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan
p.s
Here's Orac talking about your man Blaylock
Oh and Henry: thanks.
Patently we have views at odds, but I don't think I've put as much effort to this whole lark until recently, and I've enjoyed the debate.
Hope everything works out in real-life.
And that the fuckers rue the day.
Salted slug, I've been taking Vitamin D for years and have not suffered any viruses since - not even a mild cold.
Try it before you slag it off, perhaps?
First off without another Fausty who didn't take vitamin D with whom we can compare; that doesn't tell us a great deal, does it?
Secondly, a lack of vitamin D has been correlated to prevalence of cancer, shortened longevity and all the rest of it. So I'm not 'slagging it off'.
What it hasn't been shown to do is 'cure' a damn thing(apart from lack of vitamin D).
It cures rickets and osteomalacia
Which are the adult and child version of the same thing. And they are caused by that lack of vitamin D I mentioned.
http://www.vitamindrevolution.com/
Soram Khalsa Beverly Hills Doctor.
Ok Salted Why are they planning mass vaccinations? Something is fishy and its not just the squalene
Are you kidding me?
Vaccines aren't perfect. In order to be effective you need a certain take-up. eg. MMR needs about 90-95% , when it fell below 80% (after Wakefield) we had outbreaks of mumps and measles.
Same with Flu, the more people take it, the better it'll work.
Herd immunity
http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/web1.html
*Headdesk*
Yeah, hell of a debate they're having there....
we'll just have to agree to disagree Time will tell.
Post a Comment